This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2021, 12, 1372–1379, doi:10.3762/bjnano.12.101
Figure 1: Schematic image of the pancreatic cell characterized by AFM.
Figure 2: Laser confocal fluorescence images (a–d) and deflection maps (e–h) of (a, e) HDPE6-C7; (b, f) AsPC-...
Figure 3: Nanomechanical mapping, FDCs, and corresponding Young's modulus distribution of (a) HDPE6-C7, (b) A...
Figure 4: Statistics of (a) Young's modulus and (b) energy dissipation for AsPC-1, MIA-PaCa-2, BxPC-3, and HD...
Figure 5: Laser confocal fluorescence images of MIA PaCa-2 before and after DOX treatment. (a–c) Without DOX ...
Figure 6: The statistic comparison of the nanostructure and the nanomechanical properties of MIA PaCa-2 cells...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 2405–2412, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.225
Figure 1: Simulated surface of a rough brush (blue) in adhesive contact with an elastic half-space (green). A...
Figure 2: The scheme of indenting and pull-off stages of an adhesive contact of exponentially distributed pil...
Figure 3: An example of a pillar structure in compression and pull-off contact: (a) load–distance relation; (...
Figure 4: (a) Relation between the compressive force and adhesive force; (b) relation for different values of ...
Figure 5: (a) Dependence of the coefficient C on the characteristic length in region I (Figure 4); (b) the maximum va...
Figure 6: (a) Dependence of adhesion coefficient on the normalized roughness in region I (Figure 4) for different exp...